From: FORTUNE Term Sheet - Tuesday Sep 10, 2019 02:02 pm
Your daily dose of deals and dealmakers.
Term Sheet | Newsletters

Our daily brief on deals and dealmakers.

Is this email not displaying correctly?
View it in your browser.

Send Tip
September 10, 2019

Are we really nearing a recession? 

If you’re a regular Term Sheet reader, you know that despite warnings of a looming economic downturn, money is abundant, champagne is flowing, and valuations are skyrocketing.

Oh, Polina, you might say, just take a look at the inverted yield curve, which is considered a key predictor for financial downturns. Yet somehow U.S. stock markets are still near their all-time high while U.S. retail sales appear upbeat. So is the inverted yield curve … misleading? 

My colleague Lucinda spoke with Campbell Harvey, the academic who discovered the correlation between an inverted yield curve and the subsequent downturn. He stands by its predictive power. 

“I have gone on the record to issue a recession code red,” said Harvey, a professor of finance at the Fuqua School of Business at Duke University. “Growth will slow according to my model.”

From Lucinda’s story:

Indeed the spread between the 10-year and the 3-month has sustained its inversion almost perfectly for exactly a quarter—minus one singular bright spot in late July when the yields of the two treasuries dallied at around the same levels. One of the initial curves that Harvey examined, the 5-year to the 3-month, has been inverted since February. And in what seems like confirmation of the fact, the 10-year and 2 year, which has also predicted past recessions, also has turned red in August. 

Harvey notes that indicators such as GDP, unemployment rates, and the stock market are all lagging indicators—they give a snapshot of what is happening over the past quarter or now, for example. Instead, he points to a recent Chief Financial Officer survey conducted by Duke, in which 67% of CFOs said they expect a recession in late 2020. These surveys, says Harvey, can indicate how key decision makers plan to spend their money in the future.

Is it code red … or simply a false alarm? I don’t know much, but what I do know is that there are two $100 million+ fundraising rounds in the deal section below.

Read the full story here.

WEWORK FEEDBACK: In yesterday’s Term Sheet, I asked readers to weigh in on WeWork’s current predicament: What is the best possible path for WeWork at this point? Go public? Stay private? Raise more money from SoftBank? 

Here’s what you had to say. (Note that responses have been edited for length & clarity.)

Daniel: They should go public now. I worked there all of last year. I suspected, and still suspect, their goal is to be too big to fail, similar to industry leaders in Big Auto of years past.

Josh: Go public. Raising private capital from Softbank bottom-feeders will dilute the We brand.  In addition, pulling out will significantly reduce We leadership credibility.  After IPO, re-position to higher-margin product mix, increase prices, and beat estimates for 2 quarters and the stock will do just fine.  Better to do that now than 2020!

Rahm: They are screwed anyway now. The best possible option is go public at $10B, which would dilute the heck out of current investors, use the war chest to navigate through the recession…

Nadine: I say go ahead with the IPO. Their best action going forward is to focus on the outcomes they can control. They can’t control the economy or VC funding but they can control many aspects of how they run the business. If they focus on running the business, VC funding and the economy are not the decision drivers. Go for the IPO and stay laser focused.

Owen: This WeWork IPO and headline valuation is a classic example of the devil being in the details because their anchor investors have prefs. It is misleading to read: ‘SoftBank invested at $47B’ because they have a ratchet that will make them whole even if they manage to pass this camel through the eye of a needle at $20-25B range. This changes incentives and alignment of your investor base.

Ratchets are mentioned in passing here and there, but a detailed analysis of their impact on We common holders would be an interesting idea for an article. If I were a We employee I would be very interested in knowing the valuation in which my options were actually in/out of the money due to impact of VC prefs.

Minh: WeWork has to go public. Institutional investors are getting anxious to cash out before a recession hits. WeWork is currently a cash-burning machine burning through billions of dollars, so there’s a lot of pressure for the company to raise the extra capital, both from the public market as well as SoftBank. WeWork is in too deep now to stay private. People are starting to realize it’s not really a tech company; valuation has gone down to reflect that. I think WeWork’s thinking now is that things have already gone to sh*t so let’s just hope the public market will be dumb enough to bail the company out (or not).

Alexander: Venture capitalists often make big wins by being contrarian, but they also do their homework, or at least they are supposed to. I would guess that SoftBank did its homework before investing billions of dollars, and if they did, they must have bought into whatever WeWork was peddling, and it must have included some kind of promises or exuberance or other expression of optimism to counter the obvious shortcomings of the business plan. Whether WeWork exaggerated or SoftBank was too eager to participate, it seems that they are now in this together. Either way, since SoftBank provided the capital, it seems that WeWork should accommodate them.


I think WeWork will proceed with the IPO at a much-reduced value for the following reasons:

–   I don’t think they have any option but to proceed given their ongoing need for capital.

– I don’t think SoftBank can invest further at anything less than a <$20bn valuation as otherwise all of Softbank’s LPs will question Softbank’s sanity so, at that point, it makes sense for SoftBank to let others provide the funding as they nurse their massive paper loss.

–  The WeWork business model is not going to change materially so any concerns investors have now are not going to be mitigated by delaying.  If anything, the concerns will increase as WeWork add more lease assets / liabilities and may also need to show financial performance during a recession.

–  I think there is a chance that WeWork could tweak their share classes to enable it to be included in various indexes to help with demand.  

–  I expect Adam Neumann to step down as CEO within 12 months of listing too.

Scott: I have been calling the fact that a recession will significantly maim, if not kill, WeWork’s “business.”

All of this said, Softbank is on the biggest hook here and can’t afford to put up a zero or not have a positive return on the combo of Uber and We, as they make up more than 10% of the Vision Fund. Forget their threat of pulling back the $6bn credit facility.  They can’t afford to take this business public going into a potential recession and not ever get back to their high water mark of $47bn. This would be an almost certain permanent impairment of their investment.  

 The margins are razor thin (if existent at all) — this is proof that there is no sustainable long-term competitive advantage (thus, no real barrier to entry and many copycats have popping up, placing a target on WeWork’s back)

 The business is essentially a 2nd derivative of a hard asset (where they have no real asset backing the business) – those of us who lived through the last recession know exactly how well derivative businesses fare in recessions

 A large part of their business is co-working space for startups and early-stage businesses. In a downturn, I would expect the majority of these businesses would cease to exist, hence killing up to 60% of WeWork’s revenue stream, making them even more vulnerable to their long-term fixed costs (leases of over $40Bn)
– Also, most of their corporate customers are satellite offices and, thus, not mission critical for those businesses to continue as a going concern, so that revenue stream is also seriously at risk

 They have been significantly increasing their headcount on Q over Q basis since 2017, reducing their operating leverage and increasing their fixed costs, making their model even more vulnerable to a recession

 They have become “too big to fail” in markets like NYC where they are the largest leaseholder in the city. I smell bailout for the commercial real estate market in the future…

My prediction: they pull the IPO, Softbank funds the credit facility, they go into cost-cutting measures to show progress towards profitability, they reign in their growth spending and they try to weather the expected recession as a private company. They might also go the Uber route and start divesting high-growth but high-investment business units to focus on the core and try to expand their gross margins and find some operating leverage. If they do go forward with the IPO, Masayoshi Son will be signaling to the market that he is intent on losing 98% of his wealth for the second time!




- QuintoAndar, a Brazil-based real estate technology developer, raised $250 million in Series D funding at a valuation of more than $1 billion. SoftBank led the round, and was joined by investors including Dragoneer, General Atlantic and Kaszek.

- Nextdoor, Inc, a San Francisco-based neighborhood social network, raised $170 million in funding. Investors include Bond, Riverwood Capital, Benchmark, Tiger Global Management and Kleiner Perkins. 

- Volocopter, a Germany-based air taxi firm, raised 50 million euros ($55 million) in funding. Geely Holding led the round. Read more.

- Group Nine Media, a New York-based video publisher on mobile, raised $50 million in funding. Investors include Discovery Inc and Axel Springer SE.

- IceKredit, a China-based credit evaluation institution for small and micro big data-focused businesses, raised $47 million in funding. Investors include Frees Fund, Yunqi Partners, China Creation Ventures and Youzu Interactive.

- Spendesk, a Paris-based spend management platform for small to mid-sized businesses, raised $38 million in Series B funding. Index Ventures led the round.

- Canndescent, a Santa Barbara, Calif.-based cultivator of cannabis, raised $27.5 million in Series C funding. Green Acre Capital led the round, and was joined by investors including Carnegie Arch Capital, Senterra, LLC., Altitude Investment Management, JW Asset Management and a multinational beer company from Asia. 

- Vim, a San Francisco-based healthcare technology company, raised $24 million in Series B funding. Optum Ventures and Premera Blue Cross co-led the round, and were joined by investors including Great Point Ventures, Sequoia Capital and Leverage Health Solutions.

- Volta, a San Francisco-based developer of electric vehicle charging networks, today raised $20 million in follow-on to its Series C funding round, bringing the total Series C round to $100 million.

- Strong Roots, an Ireland-based frozen food business, raised $18.3 million in Series A funding. Goode Partners led the round. 

- YASA, a U.K.-based manufacturer of axial-flux electric motors and controllers for hybrid and pure electric vehicles, raised £18 million ($22 million) in funding. Investors include Parkwalk Advisors, Universal Partners Oxford Sciences Innovation, and Inovia Capital.

- Earnest Research​, a New York-based provider of data analytics products for measuring the consumer economy, raised $15 million in Series B funding. Pivot Investment Partners led the round, and was joined by investors including Greycroft, Osage and Bonfire Ventures. 

- Numerated, a Boston-based bank technology company, raised $15 million in Series B funding. Patriot Financial Partners led the round, and was joined by investors including Venrock, FINTOP Capital, and Hyperplane.

- CasperLabs, an open source blockchain platform, raised $14.5 million in Series A funding. Acuitas Group Holdings led the round, and was joined by investors including Arrington XRP Capital, Consensus Capital, Axiom Holdings Group, Digital Strategies, MW Partners, Blockchange Ventures, Hashkey Capital, and Distributed Global.

- Drivetime, a Tempe, Ariz-based developer of interactive voice games for drivers, raised $11 million in Series A financing. Makers Fund led the round.

- Zestful, a Denver-based company enabling companies to offer a customizable employee perk program, raised $5 million in seed funding. Thrive Capital led the round, and was joined by investors including Box Group, Y Combinator, Matchstick Ventures, Third Kind Capital, and Shrug Capital. 

- Fitplan Technologies, a Vancouver, British Columbia and Los Angeles-based mobile fitness platform, raised $4.5 million in funding. Corazon Capital and Sam Yagan led the round, and were joined by investors including Alex Rodriguez, Lerer Hippeau, Bullpen Capital and Advancit Capital.

- ClearAccessIP, a Palo Alto, Calif.-based developer of IP management solutions, raised $3.7 million in funding. Investors include Alpana Ventures, Plug and Play Ventures, Founder’s X and Bill Tai.

- Cyware Labs, a New York City-based threat intelligence sharing and cyber fusion product-based security company, raised $3 million in seed funding. Investors include Emerald Development Managers. 

- RHYTHM AI Ltd, a U.K.-based company focused on the treatment of Atrial Fibrillation, raised £2.15 million ($2.6 million) in seed funding. Rinkelberg Capital led the round.

- Kenmei Technologies, a Spain-based specialized company working on mobile network intelligence and automation, raised 1 million euros ($1.1 million) in seed funding. Investors include GoHub Ventures and R2 Seed Investments.


- Platelet BioGenesis Inc, a Cambridge, Mass.-based biotechnology company, raised more than $26 million in a Series A funding. Ziff Capital Partners and Qiming Venture Partners USA co-led the round, and were joined by investors including Nest.Bio Ventures and eCoast Angels.



Investing in Women is Smart Business

That’s the idea behind Launch With GS, Goldman Sachs’ commitment to invest $500mm in women-led companies and investment managers. In their efforts to narrow the gender investing gap, Goldman Sachs is also building a global network of leaders. Learn more



- Tailwind Capital acquired Ventiv Technology, Inc, an Atlanta-based software provider of integrated risk management solutions. Financial terms weren't disclosed. 

- Opus Agency, a portfolio company of Growth Catalyst Partners, acquired Tencue Productions Inc, a Berkeley, Calif.-based creative and communications agency. Financial terms weren't disclosed. 

- Southern Land Company and GTIS Partners LP acquired Auric Symphony Park, a Las Vegas-based multifamily development site. Financial terms weren't disclosed. 

- Spine & Sport Physical Therapy, a portfolio company of Great Point Partners, acquired Wisdom Physical Therapy, an El Centro, Calif.-based physical therapy provider. Financial terms weren't disclosed. 


- PEAK6 acquired Electronic Transaction Clearing Inc, a Los Angeles-based custodian and clearing provider for the institutional and professional trading marketplace. Financial terms weren't disclosed. 


- iQ Student Accommodation, a London-based student housing firm, is reportedly close to hiring bankers for an IPO. Read more.

- PropertyGuru Group, a Singaporean online realtor backed by TPG Capital and KKR, is planning an Australian IPO that could raise up to A$400 million ($275 million) this year, Reuters reports, citing sources. Read more.

- Home Co., an Australian retail property owner, is seeking to raise $300 million in an initial public offering in Australia. Read more.

- 10x Genomics, a Pleasanton, Calif.-based maker of instruments for analyzing biological information, plans to raise up to $333 million in an initial public offering of 9 million shares priced between $36 to $38 apiece. It posted revenue of $146.3 million and loss of $112.5 million in 2018. Foresite Capital, Venrock, Paladin Capital, and Fidelity back the firm. It plans to list on the Nasdaq as “TXG.” Red more.

- BioNTech, a German-based firm focused on cancer therapies, filed to raise $100 million in an IPO. It posted a revenue of 127.6 million euros ($140.8 million), and posted losses of $47.7 million ($52.6 million) in 2018.  The Strüngmann family (50%) backs the firm. It plans to list on the Nasdaq as “BNTX.” Read more.

- Topsports International Holdings, is gauging investor interest in a Hong Kong initial public offering that could raise $1 billion, The Wall Street Journal reports, citing sources. Hillhouse Capital Group backs the firm. Read more.


- Shopify agreed to acquire 6 River Systems Inc, a Waltham, Mass.-based provider of collaborative warehouse fulfillment solutions. The deal is valued at about $450 million. 6 River Systems had raised approximately $46 million in venture funding from investors including Norwest Venture Partners, Menlo Ventures, and Eclipse Ventures. 

- Advent International agreed to acquire a majority interest in DFM Foods Ltd, an India-based provider of packaged snack foods. Sellers include WestBridge Capital.

- The Riverside Company sold RE Panels S.A, the parent company of EPCO and TECSEDO, to THI Investments. Financial terms weren't disclosed. 

- GED Capital sold Nekicesa, a Spain-based converter of folding cartons supplying the pharmaceutical end-market, to Essentra. Financial terms weren't disclosed. 

- RDX, which is backed by Madison Dearborn Partners LLC, acquired Navisite LLC, an Andover, Mass.-based provider of managed cloud services, from Charter Communications. Financial terms weren't disclosed. 


- Lovell Minnick Partners, a Radnor, Penn.-based private equity firm raised $1.28 billion for its fifth fund, Partners V LP. 

- Foundation Capital, a Menlo Park, Calif.-based venture capital firm, raised $350 million for its ninth fund. 

- Link Ventures, a Cambridge-based venture capital firm, raised more than $100 million for its Link Ventures 2 fund. 

- 4BIO Capital, a London-based private equity and venture capital firm, raised more than $50 million for its second venture fund. 



- Jump Capital promoted Yelena Shkolnik to principal.

- Alison Ryu has joined Able Partners as a managing director. 

share: Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin
This message has been sent to you because you are currently subscribed to Term Sheet.

Please read our Privacy Policy, or copy and paste this link into your browser:

FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.

For Further Communication, Please Contact:
Fortune Customer Service
225 Liberty Street
New York, NY 10128

Advertising Info | Subscribe to Fortune