The Streaming Wars have barely started and they’re already exhausting There’s very little ground in the streaming services discourse that isn’t already well-trod — and it’s much too early for me to say whether Peacock can be successful. It will depend on how badly people want its comforting reruns and how good its new shows are. I will admit that since it’s the last in that very long line of streaming service unveilings, I don’t have much enthusiasm left for Peacock. That sense of exhaustion isn’t just going to be Peacock’s problem, it’s going to be everybody’s problem. And while the most obvious flavor of exhaustion will be subscription fatigue, I think collectively we’re going to get our second wind, dig deep, and find newer ways to be tired as hell at how complicated watching TV has become. We discussed this briefly on The Vergecast this week (check it out), so credit to Nilay Patel for incepting this idea: the marketing for streaming services is going to become an absolute nightmare this summer. See, to get us to subscribe to these services they need to have shows we want to watch. Very few shows will have the magical Mandalorian mix: a good show with a virally cute alien that also happens to tie directly in to the brand of the streaming service itself. Instead, many shows will be vaguely good and you’ll only vaguely know what streaming service they’re on. So to solve that problem, there will be marketing. A lot of it. With Peacock, I’m especially dreading the marketing because it’s launching right before the 2020 Olympics. NBC’s history of hagiographic self-promotion surrounding the Olympics has always been a trial to endure, but imagine what it’ll be like when it has a streaming service to flog. But even though it will all be exhausting, you can get through it. In fact, some of the themes I’ve been discussing in this very newsletter can help. So here are three pieces of advice for dealing with Streaming Service Burn Out: First, embrace the fact that there will be good shows you’ll either miss or be very late to. I called it “The Hastings Limit” last November — named after Netflix’s CEO who said that his only real competition was sleep. The Hastings Limit is the moment when you admit to yourself that there’s stuff that you would absolutely love that you’re absolutely just going to not see. Second, realize that none of these services seem to be set up to lock you into a one-year contract. You’re free to subscribe, unsubscribe, and resubscribe as often as you like. Will all that be a hassle? Yup! Should you just leave all these subscriptions active even if you’re not watching their shows? Nope! In a very indirect way we may owe a small debt of gratitude to T-Mobile CEO John Legere, who was instrumental in getting US consumers to reject the idea of two-year phone contracts and thereby force carriers to drop them. If that hadn’t happened, I could imagine a world where these streaming services were much more aggressive in asking for longer subscription periods. Third, my last piece of streaming advice is a tactic I’ve brought up time and again: even though you get the benefit of only having to pay monthly with no contract, you should think of these services in terms of their yearly price. Multiply by 12 on any monthly service before you plug in your credit card information. It’s not $9.99 a month, it’s $120 a year — same thing, different emotion. Besides, you know you’re going to forget to follow Joanna Stern’s excellent advice to do a regular audit of your subscriptions. That higher, yearly price is a better way to get your brain to contend with the actual cost. |